The most spectacular
feature uncovered by the Soprintendenza archeologica di Roma during the
1982-1985 excavations was the early third century "insula": a brick
building with a row of big, rectangular rooms along a long back wall.
Only a part of this huge building
was excavated beneath the church. It probably continued outside the church,
at least towards the east. Several different reconstructions of the insula
have been proposed (Rakob, Tortorici, De Caprariis). Henrik Boman and Katarina
Rundgren are working on a new reconstruction of the first phase of the
insula, dated by brick stamps to Caracalla (198-217).
The fundamental structure of the
known remains of the building consists of a row of rooms along a straight
back wall, with cross shaped piers in front of the walls between the rooms.
There are no traces of this building west of the long wall. The space which
was excavated in 1995 and 1998 beneath the baptistery probably was an open
space, courtyard or street, in the third century.
Some details may be important in
order to establish the plan of this building.
There were a row of doors in the
long North-South wall to the West of the rooms. This may confirm the presence
of a street or a similar open space here. East of the cross shaped
pillars, there are no traces of walls, but only drains and foundation walls.
This seems to indicate an open space within the same complex: that is,
a closed courtyard, as was proposed by Friedrich Rakob.
The presence of stairs shows that
there was an upper floor.
It is to early to say something about
the function of the building. Further comparisons with contemporary Roman
buildings are needed.
The later history of this building
is quite important but difficult to write. Contemporary fourth century
sources mention this parish, the titulus Lucinae, already in 366, when
Damasus was elected pope in Lucinis. On the other hand, the church usually
is identified with the basilica built in 432-440 by Sixtus III. Did the
parish of Lucina have a church building between 366 and 432? When excavations
began in 1982, expectations were high. Would there be any traces of a Christian
building or church beneath that built in the fifth century? The delusion
was big: The excavations in 1982-1987 not only revealed no older church
or signs of Christian presence, but no traces were found of any intermediary
period between the building of the insula and that of the church.
A closer study of the already
excavated remains together with stratigraphical information from the new
excavations give us a new picture. We still have no traces of earlier
churches or signs of Christian presence. But there are many traces of at
least one intermediary period.
One of these traces is the stratigraphy
which was excavated in 1998 in the baptistery. This area was outside the
insula but perhaps it was a street or a courtyard close to it. A series
of levels show that the ground level was raised at least twice after the
building of the insula.
Level A covered the second century
building and is probably contemporary with the building of the insula.
This ground level is inclined: it is higher to the North. This level was
raised twice before the building of the basilica. First, Level B, ca 20-30
cm, an irregular level, still inclined and higher to the North. Then level
C, but its upper surface was destroyed so we do not know its level or shape.
Here, outside the insula, the ground
was raised at least twice.
Other traces can be found in the
insula itself. The doors in the long wall have been filled up in an
intermediary period, when the ground was higher than before, but not yet
at the fifth century level. It is easy to see that the lowest part
is a foundation made in a trench dug in the ground. The ground level was
where the bricks begin.
These fillings mean 1) that the
ground was raised: and 2) that the building was used.
Was this the building where the
parish or titulus of Lucina operated?
This is a common theory. However, recent discoveries show that the basilica
may have been built already in the fourth century. In that case, there
is no reason to search for a titulus in the third century insula.
The fourth century is the period
in which modern scholars, following Charles Pietri, tend to place the creation
of the Roman tituli, the first parishes out in the Roman quarters. |